Why We Chose a Non-Stimulant Approach for Endurance Training

Why We Chose a Non-Stimulant Approach for Endurance Training

If you look at most supplements marketed to athletes, stimulants are almost always front and centre.

Caffeine. “Energy blends.” Ingredients designed to make you feel something quickly.

That approach makes sense for short, high-intensity workouts. But for endurance training, it often creates more problems than it solves.

That’s why we chose to take a different path.

Stimulants aren’t the problem — context is

Stimulants themselves aren’t inherently bad. In the right context, they can be useful.

The issue is that endurance training is a very different environment to short, intense workouts.

Long runs, long rides, and extended training sessions place different demands on the body:

Energy needs to be steady, not spiky

Hydration and absorption matter more over time

Gut comfort becomes critical

Recovery and sleep still matter after the session ends

In that context, stimulant-heavy formulas often feel mismatched.

Why “more energy” isn’t always better

Many endurance athletes have experienced this pattern:

Feeling wired early in a session

A noticeable drop halfway through

Stomach discomfort as the session goes on

Poor sleep later that night

These aren’t signs of weak training — they’re often signs of a mismatch between the product and the session.

Endurance training rewards consistency. Anything that interferes with repeatable training tends to work against long-term progress.

 

Endurance is about inputs, not spikes

For long sessions, performance is less about creating a peak and more about supporting the system.

That means focusing on:

Hydration and electrolyte balance

Fuel delivery and absorption

Mental clarity without overstimulation

Reducing friction rather than adding intensity

A non-stimulant approach allows these inputs to do their job without competing signals.

Why we deliberately avoided stimulants

Choosing a non-stimulant approach wasn’t about being different for the sake of it.

It was about building something that:

Fits naturally into long sessions

Can be used repeatedly without side effects

Doesn’t force athletes to stack multiple products

Supports training, not just the start of it

Removing stimulants simplifies the experience. It makes the product easier to use, easier to tolerate, and easier to trust over time.

Still early, still learning

This approach is still in its early stages.

We’re pre-launch, gathering feedback, and refining based on how endurance athletes actually train — not how products are typically marketed.

That means listening first, adjusting second, and avoiding unnecessary complexity.

Following the process

If a non-stimulant, endurance-focused approach makes sense for how you train, you can join our early access list to follow progress and share feedback as we continue developing the product.

👉Join the waitlist

Previous
Previous

Fuelling is one of the most misunderstood parts of endurance training.

Next
Next

Long Run fueling issues